Amit Aggarwal v. Yogita Aggarwal and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Revision against a Family Court order directing monthly maintenance to a minor son was withdrawn after parties reconciled and settled disputes through mediation.
Revision against a Family Court order directing monthly maintenance to a minor son was withdrawn after parties reconciled and settled disputes through mediation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE H IGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 221 CR R (F)-393-2023 (O&M)
Dat e of Decision: 10.12.2024
Amit Agg a rwal .… Petitioner
Versus Yogita Ag g arwal and another .... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA
Present: - Mr. Pankaj Maini, Advocate f or the petitioner.
Mr. Vimal Kumar Gutpa, Ad v ocate for the respondents.
NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL)
Challenge in the present revis i on petition is to the order dated 13.02.202 3 , passed by the learned Pr i ncipal Judge, Family Court, Faridabad, whereby the petition under S e ction 125 Cr.P.C. filed by the responden t s was partly allowed and the pe t itioner-husband was directed to pay final maintenance @ Rs.15,000/- p e r month to respondent No. 2- minor son f rom the date of filing of the pet i tioner till the age of majority. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he m a y be permitted to withdraw t he present petition as, all the disputes between the parties stands set t led between the parties vide Settlement / Compromise dated 16.10.2024 , arrived at between the parties before the Mediation and Conciliation Ce n tre of this Court and the parties have reco n ciled and started living together .
Learned counsel for the res p ondents has not disputed the aforesaid s u bmissions of learned counsel f o r the petitioner. Permitted to do so.
Dismissed as withdrawn. Pending application(s), if any , shall also stand disposed of.
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Whether Reportable Yes/No
RISHU KATARIA 2024.12.13 15:55 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Amit Aggarwal
Yogita Aggarwal
Nidhi Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court