Petition challenging interim maintenance of Rs.9,000 p.m. awarded to wife and minor child by Family Court, Bhiwani. Petitioner failed to deposit Rs.15,000 as condition for notice to explore settlement; petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRR(F)-159-2023 (O&M) - 1 -
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
222 CRR(F)-159-2023(O&M) Date of Decision: 01.10.2024 Arun Sheoran .… Petitioner
Arun Sheoran
Versus
Kavita and another .... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA
Present: - Mr. Shivam Sachdeva, Advocate for Mr. Babbar Bhan, Advocate for the petitioner.
NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL)
Challenge in the present petition is to order dated 17.12.2022 passed by learned Principal District Judge, Family Court, Bhiwani in CIS Case No. MNT-58-2021 titled as ‘ Kavita and another vs. Arun Sheoran ’ whereby petitioner-husband has been directed to pay total interim maintenance of Rs.9,000/-p.m. (Rs.6,000/-p.m. to respondent No.1-wife and Rs.3,000/-p.m. to respondent No.2-minor child).
On 02.02.2023, following order was passed by a Coordinate
Bench of this Court:-
“Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, contends that the petitioner is ready and willing to settle all disputes with respondent No.4- wife, and for that purpose, the parties may be referred to Mediation and Conciliation Centre of this Court.
DIVYANSHI 2024.10.03 10:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRR(F)-159-2023 (O&M) - 2 -
Notice of motion for 10.05.2023 only for exploring the possibility of settlement between the parties, subject to petitioner depositing an amount of 15,000 by way of demand draft, with the Registry of this Court, in favour of respondent No.1, to be paid to her on causing appearance before this Court.”
As per office report, notice could not be issued to the respondents as the amount of Rs.15,000/-, has not been deposited by the petitioner.
Learned proxy counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the
above fact.
In view of the above, present petition stands dismissed. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of.
01.10.2024
Divyanshi
( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
DIVYANSHI 2024.10.03 10:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Arun Sheoran
Kavita
Nidhi Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
