A contempt petition was closed after the contemner appeared in Court and tendered an unconditional apology by affidavit; the apology was accepted and the respondent discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CROCP-8-2021 (O&M)
Court on its own motion
....Petitioner
Versus
Daulat Singh
....Respondent
Date of decision: 25.11.2024
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESHWAR THAKUR HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA
Present: Mr. Gautam Dutt, Amicus Curiae.
Mr. R.K.S. Brar, Advocate for the respondent/contemner.
SURESHWAR THAKUR, J (ORAL)
ready and willing to furnish his unconditional apology.
(SURESHWAR THAKUR) JUDGE
November 25, 2024 (SUDEEPTI SHARMA) manoj JUDGE 1. Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes /No 2. Whether reportable : Yes /No
MANOJ KUMAR 2024.11.27 21:15 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order
Court on its own motion
Daulat Singh
Sureshwar Thakur
Sudeepti Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
