Petition to quash FIR No. 1042/2018 (Sections 420, 406, 120-B IPC) based on compromise; parties failed to appear before trial court for statements, and petitioner sought withdrawal. Petition disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
251 CRM-M-9619-2024 Date of Decision: 14.08.2024
Shailender ....... Pe��oner
Versus
State of Haryana and another ......... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA
Present Mr. Kamal Chaudhary, Advocate for the pe��oner.
Mr. Aashish Bishnoi, D.A.G., Haryana.
None for respondent No. 2.
****
ANOOP CHITKARA, J. (ORAL)
| FIR No. | Dated | Police Sta1on | Sec1ons |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1042 | 16.10.2018 | Faridabad Central, Faridabad |
420, 406, 120-B IPC |
The present pe��on has been filed under Sec�on 482 CrPC for quashing of above
cap�oned FIR along with all consequen�al proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise and affidavit of complainant dated 14.11.2022.
as such, statements could not be recorded.
(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE
| 14.08.2024 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Jyo�-II | ||
| Whether speaking/reasoned | Yes/No | |
| Whether Reportable | Yes/No |
JYOTI 2024.08.15 08:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Shailender
State of Haryana
Anoop Chitkara
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
