Application seeking leave to appeal was dismissed as the applicant had no representation on the hearing date or the previous date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
N.C. No.2024:PHHC:025010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
271
CRM-A-940-2023 (O&M) Date of decision: 21.02.2024
KRISHNA
....Applicant(s)
Versus
M/S RADHA RANI FILLING STATION
...Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY
Present : None.
SANJIV BERRY. J. (Oral)
There is no representation on behalf of the applicant. Even on the last date of hearing, none had put in appearance on behalf of the applicant. As such, the present application seeking leave to appeal stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
Pending applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of.
| (SANJIV BERRY) JUDGE |
|
|---|---|
| 21.02.2024 | |
| S.Sharma(syr) | |
| Whether speaking/reasoned | : Yes/No |
| Whether reportable | : Yes/ No |
SANDAL SHARMA 2024.02.23 10:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment
Krishna
M/s Radha Rani Filling Station
Sanjiv Berry
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
