Petitioner did not press the criminal revision application, leading the court to dismiss it as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
236 ����������������� IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-9362-2024
Date of decision : 27.02.2024
BRIJESH SINGH
....Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB
....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN
Present : Mr. Arun Takhi, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. J.S. Arora, DAG, Punjab.
PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL)
Counsel for the petitioner does not wish to press this petition at
this stage.
February 27, 2024 (Pankaj Jain) Dpr Judge Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
Deepak Kumar 2024.02.28 09:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Brijesh Singh
State of Punjab
Pankaj Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
