Petitioner's counsel did not wish to press the petition at this stage; the court dismissed the petition as not pressed without recording any substantive decision.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
214
2024:PHHC:043510 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-934-2024 (O&M) Date of decision : 02.04.2024
RAHUL MALIK
....Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN
Present: Mr. Saurabh Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. A.K. Sehrawat, DAG, Haryana.
PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL)
Counsel for the petitioner does not wish to press this petition at
this stage.
Dismissed as not pressed.
| April 02, 2024 | (Pankaj Jain) |
|---|---|
| Dpr | Judge |
| Whether speaking/reasoned | : Yes/No |
| Whether reportable | : Yes/No |
Deepak Kumar 2024.04.02 17:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Rahul Malik
State of Haryana
Pankaj Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
