Allowed

Akashdeep Singh Alias Danny Alias Giani v. State of Punjab

Punjab & Haryana HC13 Mar 2024CRM-M/7227/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed a bail petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for offences under IPC and Arms Act, noting the petitioner's clean antecedents, lack of injury, compromise in the main case, and incarceration for over three months. The state could not dispute factual assertions.

What did the court decide?

Regular bail granted to the petitioner on furnishing bail bonds/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the Trial Court/Duty Magistrate.

Akashdeep Singh Alias Danny Alias Giani Vs State… — Quashing and FIR | Punjab & Haryana HC (2024)

¶1

CRM-M-7227-2024 (O&M)

¶2

1 2024:PHHC:035862

¶3

218

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶5

CRM-M-7227-2024 (O&M) Date of decision : 13.03.2024

¶6

AKASHDEEP SINGH ALIAS DANNY ALIAS GIANI ....Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

STATE OF PUNJAB ....Respondent

¶9

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN

¶10

Present : Mr. Ramnish Puri, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶11

Mr. Mohit Kapoor, Sr. DAG, Punjab.

¶12

PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL)

¶13

CRM No.6364 of 2024

¶14

Allowed as prayed for.

¶15

CRM-M-7227-2024

¶16

This petition has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case F.I.R. No.39 dated 13.04.2023 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 307, 452, 427, 506, 148, 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 25, 27 of Arms Act, 1959 at Police Station Kathunangal, District Amritsar.

¶17

Custody Certificate of the petitioner has been filed today in Court. The same is taken on record.

¶18

Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been nominated on the basis of disclosure made by Samandeep Singh @ Raja @ Sanamdeep Singh and Sahildeep Singh. Its a case of no injury. Qua

¶19

Deepak Kumar 2024.03.13 17:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶20

CRM-M-7227-2024 (O&M) 2

¶21

2024:PHHC:035862

¶22

Samandeep Singh @ Raja @ Sanamdeep Singh, the FIR already stands quashed on the basis of compromise vide order dated 28^th of August, 2023 passed in CRM-M-31450-2023. The petitioner is behind bars for more than 3 months and 27 days and has clean antecedents.

¶23

State Counsel is not in posititon to dispute the factual assertions made by counsel for the petitioner based on record.

¶24

I have heard counsel for the parties and have gone through records of the case.

¶25

Without commenting on the merits of the case, keeping in view the incarceration already suffered by the petitioner, nature of allegations against the petitioner and the nature of evidence against him, the present petition is allowed. The petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bonds/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the Trial Court/Duty Magistrate concerned.

¶26

Needless to say that anything observed hereinabove shall not be construed to be an expression of opinion on the merits of the case.

¶27

March 13, 2024	(Pankaj Jain)
Dpr	Judge
Whether speaking/reasoned	: Yes/No
Whether reportable	: Yes/No

¶28

Deepak Kumar 2024.03.13 17:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Akashdeep Singh Alias Danny Alias Giani v. State of Punjab

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Akashdeep Singh Alias Danny Alias Giani v. State of Punjab

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Parmod Vs State of Haryana and Another

Sahilpreet Singh @ Sahil Vs State of Punjab

Murti and Ors. Vs State of Haryana and Anr.

Om Parkash Vs Satbir Singh Kundu and Another

Inderjit and Anr. Vs State of Punjab

Gurpreet Singh Vs State of Punjab