Petition sought quashing of an FIR under Section 498-A IPC registered at Police Station NRI, SAS Nagar. After the petitioner handed over a Demand Draft and cash to respondent No.2 pursuant to an earlier order, counsel sought withdrawal of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRM-M-7205-2022
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
234
Criminal Misc. No. M-7205 of 2022 Date of decision :-20.11.2024
Pritpal Singh
…..Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and another
…..Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA
Present:Mr. Bhupender Singh, Advo c ate for Mr. Rishi Kaushal, Advocat e for the petitioner.
Ms. Rishu Madan, AAG, Pu n jab.
Mr. Ajay Pal Singh, Advoca t e for respondent No.2.
NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral)
Prayer in this petition is f o r quashing of FIR No.011 dated 2 2 .5.2020 (Annexure P-10) u n der Section 498-A IPC, registere d at Police Station NRI, Distri c t SAS Nagar (Mohali), on merits .
In compliance of last order dated 03.10.2024 passed by this Cou r t, learned counsel for the petit i oner has brought a Demand Draft b e aring No.500626 dated 0 1.10.2024, amounting to Rs.2,40,000/- in favour of respondent No.2 and Rs.10,000/- in cash. The sam e have been handed over to le a rned counsel for respondent No.2 in the Court, who undertakes t o handed over the same to
VIJAY ASIJA 2024.11.22 11.29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
2
CRM-M-7205-2022
responde n t No.2 today itself. Photocop y of the said Demand Draft is taken on r ecord.
Learned counsel for the St a te, on instructions, informs this Cour t that the trial before the learne d trial Court is going on; the complain a nt has been partly examined; a n d the next date fixed before the lear n ed trial Court is 04.12.202 4 for recording of further prosecuti o n evidence.
At this stage, learned couns e l for the petitioner prays for
withdrawal of the present petition.
Permitted to do so.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
Pending application(s), if an y , shall stands disposed of.
Novemb e r 20, 2024 ( NIDHI GUPTA ) Vijay Asija JUDGE
Whether sp e aking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Re p ortable Yes / No
VIJAY ASIJA 2024.11.22 11.29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Pritpal Singh
State of Punjab
Respondent No.2
Nidhi Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
