Petitioners and respondent No.2 failed to appear on four consecutive hearing dates despite listing in the urgent list; the High Court inferred the parties were not interested in pursuing the petition and dismissed it for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
123 CRM-M-6555-2024 Date of Decision : December 12, 2024
SONU ALIAS JAI BHAGWAN AND OTHERS -PETITIONERS
V/S
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER -RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI
Present: None for the petitioners.
Mr. Rajesh Gaur, Addl. A.G., Haryana.
None for the respondent No.2. ***
KULDEEP TIWARI, J. (ORAL)
(KULDEEP TIWARI) December 12, 2024 JUDGE devinder Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No
DEVINDER YADAV 2024.12.13 08:54 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment
Sonu alias Jai Bhagwan and others
State of Haryana
Respondent No.2
Kuldeep Tiwari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
