Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. sought directions for a status report before the Judicial Magistrate at Mohali. The State filed an affidavit and the SHO submitted the status report, redressing the grievance. The court dismissed the petition as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
�����������������
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
108. CRM-M No.6175 of 2024 (O&M) Date of Decision:14.03.2024
Muskan Raj ... Petitioner Versus
State of Punjab and others
... Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR
Present: Mr. Avinit Avasthi, Advocate for the petitioner.
HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (ORAL)
(HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE
March 14, 2024 Pankaj* Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
PANKAJ KUMAR 2024.03.14 19:15 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether directions should issue to the State to submit a status report before the Judicial Magistrate in the pending matter?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Muskan Raj
State of Punjab
Harpreet Singh Brar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
