Petition seeking medical care in custody; after the State filed a medical status report showing examination at AIIMS Bathinda and further referral, counsel did not press the petition and it was dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
227 CRM-M-6058-2024 Date of decision: 22.07.2024
SURJIT SINGH
....Petitioner
V/s
STATE OF PUNJAB
....Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL
Present: Mr. Damanjeet Bhoriwal, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Amit Rana, Sr. DAG, Punjab.
MANJARI NEHRU KAUL, J. (ORAL)
petitioner does not press the instant petition.
July 22, 2024
poonam
(MANJARI NEHRU KAUL) JUDGE
POONAM RATHORE 2024.07.23 14:40 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether reportable: No
Surjit Singh
State of Punjab
Manjari Nehru Kaul
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
