Anticipatory bail petition rendered infructuous as the petitioner had been arrested; counsel sought disposal, which the court allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
205 CRM- M -56368-2022 (O&M) Date of decision: 16.05.2024
Gautam ..Petitioner
Versus
State of Hary a na
..Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY
Present: M r. Vikas Bishnoi, Advocate for t he petitioner.
M r. Jagdish Manchanda, Addl. A G , Haryana.
AMAN CHAUDHARY, J (Oral)
( AMAN CHAUDHARY ) 16.05.2024 JUDGE ashok
W hether speaking/reasoned : Y es/No W hether reportable : Y es/No
ASHOK KUMAR 2024.05.16 17:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Gautam
State of Haryana
Aman Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
