A quashing petition under Section 528 BNSS 2023 seeking quashing of FIR No. 38 dated 08.03.2024 under Section 420 IPC was withdrawn by the petitioners with liberty to file afresh; the Court permitted withdrawal and disposed of the petition as withdrawn with pending applications also disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
109
CRM-M-54472-2024 (O&M)
Date of Decision: 04.11.2024
Parvinder Singh and another
....Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and another ....Respondents
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA
Present: Mr. Bhupinder Banga, Advocate for the petitioners.
Ms. Swati Batra, DAG, Punjab.
Mr. Imran Ahmed Ali, Advocate for respondent No.2.
ANOOP CHITKARA, J.
| FIR No. | Dated | Police Station | Sections |
|---|---|---|---|
| 38 | 08.03.2024 | Mahilpur, District Hoshiarpur | 420 IPC |
CRM-43383-2024
Allowed, as prayed for.
Main case
Seeking quashing of the above captioned FIR, petitioners have come up before this Court by filing the present petition under Section 528 BNSS 2023.
No.2 filed his memo of appearance which is taken on record. He further submits that he has no
objection if the present FIR is quashed.
petition with liberty to file a fresh.
ANJU RANI 2024.11.05 10:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court Chandigarh
Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.
(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE
04.11.2024 anju rani Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable? No
ANJU RANI 2024.11.05 10:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court Chandigarh
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Parvinder Singh and another
State of Punjab
respondent No.2
Anoop Chitkara
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
