Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. sought quashing of an FIR under Sections 498-A and 406 IPC. Counsel, finding the Court not inclined to grant the prayer, sought withdrawal; the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 223 CRM-M-4892-2022 (O&M) Date of Decision: 28.11.2024
Usha Rani
.… Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and another
.... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA
Present: - Mr. Naveen Batra, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Aakanksha Gupta, A.A.G., Punjab.
Mr. V.K.Kaushal, Advocate for respondent No.2.
NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL)
Prayer in the present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is for quashing of FIR No. 40 dated 19.03.2021 registered under Sections 498-A, 406 IPC at Police Station City Hoshiarpur, District Hoshiarpur (Annexure P-1) and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom.
After arguing for some time, when this Court is not inclined to grant the prayer made, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw present petition.
Permitted to do so.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
Pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of.
28.11.2024 ( NIDHI GUPTA ) Divyanshi JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
DIVYANSHI 2024.11.29 10:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Should FIR No. 40 dated 19.03.2021 under Sections 498-A and 406 IPC be quashed under Section 482 Cr.P.C.?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Usha Rani
State of Punjab
Respondent No.2
Nidhi Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
