A one-line order allowing a bail-related criminal petition by reference to a companion decision passed the same day in a connected case.
Petition allowed per companion order of even date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRM-M-4890-2024 (O&M) -1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
232
CRM-M-4890-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 14.10.2024
SUKHWINDER RAM ALIAS CHUCHU
....Petitioner(s)
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA
...Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY
Present : Mr. Vipin Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Surender Singh, A.A.G. Haryana.
SANJIV BERRY, J. (ORAL)
Petition is allowed.
For detailed order, see order of even date passed in CRM-M-
3844-2024 titled as Govinda @ Binda v/s State of Haryana.
(SANJIV BERRY) JUDGE
14.10.2024 S.Sharma(syr)
i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No
SANDAL SHARMA 2024.10.15 17:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Govinda @ Binda v/s State of HaryanaReferred
CRM-M-3844-2024
Sukhwinder Ram alias Chuchu
State of Haryana
Sanjiv Berry
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
