Petitioner filed a bail petition under Section 439 CrPC which was later dismissed as it was not pressed by the learned counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
227
2024:PHHC:015392 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-4849-2024
Date of Decision: February 05, 2024
PARMOD @ MADI
........Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA
........Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA
Present: Ms. Gurmeet Kaur Dhillon, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Rajiv Sidhu, DAG, Haryana.
HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL)
By way of present petition filed under Section 439 CrPC, prayer has been made for grant of regular bail pending trial in case FIR No.715 dated 06.09.2023 registered under Sections 379-A/B, 341, 120B & 34 of IPC and Sections 25, 54 and 59 of Arms Act, at P.S. Karnal City, District Karnal.
Having argued for some time, learned counsel for the
petitioner does not intend to press the petition, at this stage.
Dismissed as not pressed.
05.02.2024
Tejwinder
| ( |
HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE |
|---|---|
| Whether speaking/reasoned | Yes/No |
| Whether Reportable | Yes/No |
TEJWINDER SINGH 2024.02.06 10:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Parmod @ Madi
State of Haryana
Harkesh Manuja
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
