Petitioner sought regular bail under Section 483 BNSS in an FIR registered under Sections 302, 297, 34, 201, 295, 149 IPC and Arms Act provisions. Counsel withdrew the petition at the outset; the Court disposed of it as withdrawn along with pending miscellaneous applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
228 CRM-M-47094-2024
Date of Decision: 06.11.2024
Rajveer Singh ......... Pe��oner
Versus State of Punjab ......... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA
Present: Mr. A.P.S. Deol, Senior Advocate with Mr. Himmat Singh Deol, Advocate for the pe��oner.
Mr. Sukhdev Singh, A.A.G, Punjab. Mr. Guninder Singh Brar, Advocate for the complainant.
****
ANOOP CHITKARA, J. (ORAL)
| FIR No. | Dated | Police Sta1on | Sec1ons | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | 31.01.2020 | Kot Bhai, District | 302, 297, 34, | 201, 295, 149 |
| Sri Muktsar Sahib | IPC and 25, Arms Act |
27, 54, 45/49 |
this Court under Sec�on 483 BNSS seeking regular bail.
taken on record. Copy thereof has been supplied to counsel for the pe��oner.
pending miscellaneous applica�ons, if any, stand disposed of.
(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE
06.11.2024
Jyo�-II
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
JYOTI 2024.11.07 09:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Rajveer Singh
State of Punjab
Anoop Chitkara
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
