Second regular bail petition under Section 439 CrPC in an NDPS Act case; counsel for the petitioner chose not to press the petition, and it was dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
328
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-45041-2024 Date of Decision: September 17, 2024
SOURAV @ SAURABH @ NONU ........Petitioner Versus STATE OF PUNJAB ........Respondent
........Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Present: M r . Chander Shekhar Kad, Ad v ocate for M r . B.S. Bhalla, Advocate for t h e petitioner.
M r . Siddharth Sandhu, AAG, P u njab.
HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL)
B y way of this second petition filed under Section 439 o f CrPC, prayer has been made for grant of r e gular bail to the petitioner i n case bearing FIR No.85 dated 17.08.20 2 3 registered under Section s 22(C), 25, 2 7 -A, 29, 61 and 85 of NDP S Act, 1985 at P.S. Valtoha, District Tarn T aran.
L e arned counsel for the pe t itioner does not press th e present petiti o n, at this stage. Di s missed as not pressed.
17.09.2024
Tejwinder
| ( |
HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE |
|---|---|
| Whether speaking/reasone d |
Yes/No |
| Whether Reportable | Yes/No |
TEJWINDER SINGH 2024.09.19 10:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Sourav @ Saurabh @ Nonu
State of Punjab
Harkesh Manuja
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
