Hearing a petition for quashing an FIR, the Court allowed withdrawal of the petition. Liberty was granted to the petitioner to file a discharge application before the trial court with a directive for a reasoned order.
Petition allowed as withdrawn with liberty to file application for discharge before trial court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
CRM-M-42700-2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
123
CRM-M No.42700 of 2024
Decided on: 20.09.2024.2024
Rohit Kumar ... Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and Others … Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present : Mr. J.S Cooner, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Vikrant Pamboo, Sr. DAG, Haryana.
ANOOP CHITKARA, J.
| FIR No. | Dated | Police Station | Sections |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04 | 04.01.2022 | Naggal, District Ambala | 120-B, 409, 420 IPC |
Sonia Puri 2024.09.23 10:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1
2
CRM-M-42700-2024
(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE
20.09.2024 Sonia Puri Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether reportable: No.
Sonia Puri 2024.09.23 10:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow quashing of FIR maintaining accused right to file discharge application before trial court.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rohit Kumar
State of Haryana
Anoop Chitkara
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
