Petition under Section 482 CrPC sought quashing of an FIR registered for cheating and criminal breach of trust. Counsel informed the court that petitioner No.2 had been acquitted and the complainant had appealed. The court disposed of the petition as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
259
CRM-M-42372-2013
Date of Decision: 22.08.2024
M/s Konark Infra Developers Pvt. Ltd. and another
....Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana and another ....Respondents
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA
Present: None for the petitioners.
Mr. Parveen Bhadu, Asst. AG, Haryana.
Mr. Gautam Pathania, Advocate for respondent No.2.
ANOOP CHITKARA, J.
| FIR No. | Dated | Police Station | Sections |
|---|---|---|---|
| 192 | 23.07.2011 | Khaidkidaula, Gurgaon | 420, 406 IPC |
Seeking quashing of the above captioned FIR, petitioner has come up before this Court by filing the present petition under Section 482 CrPC.
22.08.2024 anju rani
(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable? No
ANJU RANI 2024.08.23 16:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court Chandigarh
1 issue framed by the court
Should the FIR be quashed when petitioner No.2 has already been acquitted in the underlying case?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
M/s Konark Infra Developers Pvt. Ltd.
State of Haryana
Anoop Chitkara
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
