Regular bail plea under Section 439 CrPC in a case involving Sections 307, 341, 427, 506, 34 IPC and Section 25 Arms Act was dismissed after State counsel disclosed additional pending criminal cases against the petitioner not mentioned in the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRM-M-4236-2024
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
268
CRM-M-4236-2024 Date of Decision: 12.08.2024
Palwinder Singh @ Pappis
...Pe��oner
Versus
State of Punjab
…Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA
Present: Mr. V.K. Sandhir, Advocate for the pe��oner.
Mr. Jasjit Singh, DAG, Punjab.
ANOOP CHITKARA, J.
| FIR No. | Dated | Police Sta.on | Sec.ons |
|---|---|---|---|
| 149 | 07.12.2023 | Rajasansi, District | 307, 341, 427, 506, 34 IPC read |
| Amritsar | with Sec�on 25 of Arms Act |
The pe��oner incarcerated in the FIR cap�oned above, has come up before this Court under Sec�on 439 CrPC seeking bail.
(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE
| 12.08.2024 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Jyo�-II | ||
| Whether speaking/reasoned | Yes/No | |
| Whether Reportable | Yes/No |
JYOTI 2024.08.14 09:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.
1 issue framed by the court
Should the petitioner under Section 439 CrPC be released on bail in FIR No. 149 dated 07.12.2023 for offences including Section 307 IPC?
7 provisions across 3 enactments
Palwinder Singh @ Pappis
State of Punjab
Anoop Chitkara
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
