Petition seeking anticipatory bail for an FIR under Section 118(1) BNS was withdrawn by the petitioner's counsel mid-argument and dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
102
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-41935-2024 Date of Decision: August 29, 2024
KULVIR SINGH
…...Petitioner(s)
V/S
STATE OF PUNJAB …...Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL
Present: Mr. Sarju Puri, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. J.S. Rattu, DAG, Punjab.
SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J.(ORAL)
This petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 482 Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.72 dated 15.07.2024 under Section 118(1) of BNS, 2023 registered at Police Station Sadar Banga, District SBS Nagar.
After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the instant case
Allowed as prayed for.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
(SANDEEP MOUDGIL) JUDGE
29.08.2024 Sangeeta Whether reasoned/speaking: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
SANGEETA 2024.08.30 19:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Kulvir Singh
State of Punjab
Sandeep Moudgil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
