One-line cross-reference order: the High Court directed that the detailed order be seen in CRM-M No.34999 of 2019 (S. Rajgopal Vs. State of Haryana and others) of even date. No independent reasoning or proposition of law appears in this judgment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
�����������������
252. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M No.38271 of 2019 (O&M) Reserved on: 21.03.2024 Pronounced on:02.04.2024
Subodh Bhargava
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR
Present: Mr. Alankar Narula, Advocate and Mr. Subhash Gulati, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Vikas Bharadwaj, AAG, Haryana.
Mr. Denson Joseph, Advocate and Mr. Karambir Kamal, Advocate for respondent No.3-complainant.
HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J.
For detailed order, see order passed in CRM-M No.34999 of 2019
titled as S. Rajgopal Vs. State of Haryana and others of even date.
(HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE
April 02, 2024 Pankaj* Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
PANKAJ KUMAR 2024.04.03 13:29 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Subodh Bhargava
State of Haryana
Harpreet Singh Brar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
