Regular bail petition under Section 439 CrPC in an NDPS FIR involving alleged recovery of lomotil tablets was not pressed by counsel as the trial was nearing completion with most witnesses examined. The court disposed of the petition and requested the trial court to conclude proceedings within four months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
228
2024:PHHC:025081
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-3815-2024 Date of Decision: February 22, 2024
GURJIT SINGH @ JITI
........Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB
........Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA
Present: Mr. Navraj Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Davinder Bir Singh, Sr. DAG, Punjab.
HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL)
By way of present petition filed under Section 439 CrPC, prayer has been made for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.206 dated 28.11.2021 registered under Section 22-C, 61 and 85 of NDPS Act at P.S. STF, Phase-4, SAS Nagar, Mohali wherein the petitioner has been implicated against the alleged recovery of 6000 tablets of lomotil.
4. Disposed of in the aforesaid terms.
| 22.02.2024 | (HARKESH MANUJA) | |
|---|---|---|
| Tejwinder | JUDGE | |
| Whether speaking/reasoned | Yes/No | |
| Whether Reportable | Yes/No |
TEJWINDER SINGH 2024.02.23 12:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether regular bail should be granted for alleged NDPS recovery of lomotil tablets, given trial nearing completion.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Gurjit Singh @ Jiti
State of Punjab
Harkesh Manuja
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
