Petition dismissed as withdrawn after counsel sought leave to withdraw when the Court was not inclined to entertain it. Decides nothing of general application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
224
CRM-M-3757-2024 Date of decision: July 8th , 2024
Krishan
.....Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
.....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL
Present: Mr. Nirmal Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Trishanjali Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana.
MANJARI NEHRU KAUL, J. (ORAL)
After arguing for some time, when this Court was not inclined, a prayer was made by learned counsel for the petitioner for withdrawal of the instant petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
| July 8th | , 2024 (MA |
NJARI NEHRU KAUL) |
|---|---|---|
| Puneet | JUDGE | |
| Whether speaking/reasoned | : Yes |
|
| Whether reportable | : No |
PUNEET SACHDEVA 2024.07.08 15:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Krishan
State of Haryana
Manjari Nehru Kaul
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
