Petition sought quashing of an FIR for offences under Sections 323/324/506 IPC after parties compromised before the trial court, which found the compromise genuine and voluntary. Allowing the petition, the High Court quashed the FIR and consequential proceedings qua the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
MAMTA
2024.10.04 18:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment
CRM-M-36660-2024 -2-
(N.S. SHEKHAWAT) 04.10.2024 JUDGE mks/mamta
Whether Speaking/Reasoned: YES / NO Whether Reportable: YES / NO
MAMTA 2024.10.04 18:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an FIR registered on the basis of a genuine voluntary compromise between the parties can be quashed under Section 482 CrPC.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab and anotherRelied on
2012 (4) RCR (Criminal) 543
Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of PunjabRelied on
2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mamta
State of Punjab
N.S. Shekhawat
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
