Regular bail petition where the trial was virtually complete, all prosecution witnesses having been examined and only defence evidence remaining. The Court declined bail given the serious offences alleged and disposed of the petition directing expeditious conclusion of the trial.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana At Chandigarh
CRM-M-36107-2022 (O&M) Date of Decision:-29.10.2024
Deepak
… Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL
Present:Mr. Sushil Jain, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Neeraj Sheoran, DAG, Haryana.
GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J .(Oral)
29.10.2024 ( Gurvinder Singh Gill ) geeta Judge Whether speaking /reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No
GEETA RANI 2024.10.29 18:42 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be granted regular bail when the trial is at its fag end with all prosecution witnesses examined.
Deepak
State of Haryana
Gurvinder Singh Gill
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
