Disposed

Gajraj v. State of Haryana and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC12 Sept 2024CRM-M/35876/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A petitioner, who is a complainant in a case where some accused are at large despite pending challan and dismissed anticipatory bail, sought intervention. The High Court, without commenting on merits, directed the police to expeditiously consider a pending representation.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent No.2 (police) to consider and dispose of the representation dated 15.04.2024 in an expeditious manner.

Gajraj Vs State of Haryana and Others — Anticipatory Bail | Punjab & Haryana HC (2024)

¶1

CRM-M-35876-2024 (O&M)

¶2

-1

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶4

116

¶5

CRM-M-35876-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 12.09.2024

GAJRAJ

....Petitioner(s)

Versus

STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

¶10

...Respondent(s)

¶11

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY

¶12

Present : Mr. M.D. Khan, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶13

¶14

SANJIV BERRY, J. (ORAL)

¶15

CRM-29858-2024

¶16

For the reasons stated in the application, same is allowed. Exemption is granted. CRM-M-35876-2024

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner happens to be the complainant of case FIR (Annexure P-2), wherein the police has presented challan on 01.12.2023 against two accused named in the FIR, however, the Police had mentioned in the challan that the remaining accused are yet to be arrested. He contends that the anticipatory bail filed by one of the accused namely Kiran Kaushik stood dismissed by this Court vide order dated 21.12.2021 (Annexure P-3), however, the accused persons are freely roaming in the area and the police is not taking any action. He further contends that the petitioner had moved representations Annexures P-6 and

¶18

SANDAL SHARMA 2024.09.13 16:49 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

¶19

CRM-M-35876-2024 (O&M) -2

¶20

P-7 to respondent No.3 and respondent No.2 respectively, but the police authorities are silently sitting over the representations.��

¶21

� ��!�

¶22

"� #��$��%��Ms. Gaganpreet Kaur, DAG Haryana��&��

¶23

5 . After considering the respective submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner and the averments made in the petition, without commenting on the merits thereof, the present petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No.2 to consider and dispose of the representation dated 15.04.2024 (Annexure P-7) in accordance with law in an expeditious manner. The decision so taken be intimated to the petitioner as well.

¶24

(SANJIV BERRY) JUDGE

¶25

12.09.2024 S.Sharma(syr)

¶26

i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No

¶27

SANDAL SHARMA 2024.09.13 16:49 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

Gajraj v. State of Haryana and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gajraj v. State of Haryana and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Varinderpal Singh Alias Happy Vs State of Punjab

Manjit Singh Alias Babbu Vs State of Punjab and Another

Prahlad Saini Alias Parhalad Saini Vs State of Haryana

Deshraj Alias Desu Vs State of Haryana

Harman Sharma and Another Vs State of Punjab and Others

Ajay Kumar Vs State of Punjab