Petitioner filed a writ petition praying quashing of an FIR on the basis of a compromise. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner with liberty to avail an alternative remedy, allowed as prayed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (276) CRM-M- 35051 of 2024 Date of decision : 05.12.2024
Sonu ................Petitioner
vs.
State of Haryana and another .................Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ
Present: Ms. Sujata, Advocate for
Mr. Parminder Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Tanuj Sharma, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana.
Ms. Kamlesh, Advocate for respondent No.2
RAJESH BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral)
( RAJESH BHARDWAJ ) 05.12.2024 JUDGE chugh
Whether speaking / reasoned Yes / No Whether reportable Yes / No
BANITA CHUGH 2024.12.07 11:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Sonu
State of Haryana
Rajesh Bhardwaj
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
