Petitioner sought to withdraw the petition after arguments; the High Court dismissed it as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
N.C. No.2024:PHHC:032643
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
248
CRM-M-3321-2024 (O&M) Date of decision: 06.03.2024
JASKARAN SINGH
....Petitioner(s)
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB
...Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY
Present : Mr. Sanyam Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioner(s).
Mr. Japjot Singh, AAG Punjab.
SANJIV BERRY. J. (Oral)
After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the petition at this stage.
Dismissed as withdrawn at this stage
(SANJIV BERRY) JUDGE 06.03.2024 S.Sharma(syr) Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/ No
SANDAL SHARMA 2024.03.11 18:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment
Jaskaran Singh
State of Punjab
Sanjiv Berry
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
