This oral order grants an absolute order on a petition for anticipatory bail filed under Section 438 CrPC. The court directed the petitioners to continue cooperating with the investigation and abide by conditions under Section 438(2) CrPC.
Grant of anticipatory bail allowed subject to conditions of appearing before Investigating Agency.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRM-M-3200-2024
2024:PHHC:023497
1
280
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-3200-2024
Date of Decision:20.02.2024
Jarnail Singh and another
....Petitioners
Vs.
State of Punjab ....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA
Present : Mr. Navjot Narang, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Sidharth Sandhu, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab.
HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL)
[1] Through this petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. prayer has been made for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner, in case Rapat No. 30 dated 21.12.2018 under Sections 324, 452, 148 and 149 of IPC 1860, and Sections 25 and 27 of the Arms Act, 1959, in FIR No.275 dated 20.12.2018, under Sections 307, 341, 506, 148 and 149 of IPC 1860, and Sections 25 and 27 of Arms Act, 1959 registered at Police Station, Sadar, District Ferozepur.
[2] Learned State counsel on instructions from the officer concerned, submits that in compliance of order dated 22.01.2024, petitioners have joined the investigation and are no more required for further interrogation.
[3] Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, order dated 22.01.2024 passed by this Court is made absolute, however, the
MONIKA RANI 2024.02.22 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order
CRM-M-3200-2024
2024:PHHC:023497
2
petitioners shall keep on appearing before the Investigating Agency as and when required and shall abide by the conditions as envisaged under Section 438(2) CrPC.
[4] Disposed of accordingly.
| 20.02.20 monika |
24 |
( HARKESH MANUJA ) JUDGE |
|---|---|---|
| Whether Speaking/reasoned | Yes/No | |
| Whether Reportable | Yes/No |
MONIKA RANI 2024.02.22 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail prayer in the pending cases should be granted.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Jarnail Singh
State of Punjab
HARKESH MANUJA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
