The single judge dismissed the bail application as withdrawn after allowing a connected application to withdraw the main petition and taking up the main case for hearing the same day.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
108
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-45978-2024 in/and CRM-M-31702-2024 Date of Decision: November 28, 2024
Rizwan@ Rijwan
......Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
......Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ
Present: Mr.Vishal Malik, Advocate for the applicant/petitioner. Mr.Sumit Jain, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. Mr.Ravi Malik, Advocate for the complainant.
RAJESH BHARDWAJ, J.(ORAL)
CRM-45978-2024
Instant application has been filed praying to withdraw the main
petition.
For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed. Main case is taken up on Board today itself by preponing the date of hearing.
CRM-M-31702-2024
Present petition has been filed praying for grant of regular bail in FIR No.10, dated 20.01.2024, under Sections 120B, 406, 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC, registered at Police Station Sanoli, District Panipat.
In view of the prayer made in CRM-45978-2024, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
| November 28, 2024 | ( RAJESH BHARDWAJ ) |
|---|---|
| meenuss | JUDGE |
| 1. Whether speaking/reasoned ? |
Yes/No |
| 2. Whether reportable ? |
Yes/No |
MEENU2024.11.30 14:19 2. I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Rizwan @ Rijwan
State of Haryana
Rajesh Bhardwaj
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
