Chirag Kinra v. State of Haryana
Case brief
What is this about?
Petition seeking bail became infructuous as petitioner was granted default bail under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C.; petition disposed of accordingly.
Petition seeking bail became infructuous as petitioner was granted default bail under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C.; petition disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:PHHC:032212
[232] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-3097-2024
Date of Decision : 06.03.2024
Chirag Kinra
…Petitioner
versus
State of Haryana ….Respondent
Coram : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA
Present : Mr. Harsh Kinra, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sumit Jain, Addl. AG, Haryana.
DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL)
[1] Statement is made by learned counsel for the petitioner that
this petition has become infructuous, as the petitioner has already been allowed the default bail under Section 167 (2) Cr.P.C.
[2] In view of the aforesaid statement, the present petition stands disposed of as having become infructuous.
(DEEPAK GUPTA) JUDGE
06.03.2024 ‘Rajneesh' Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
RAJNEESH SHARMA 2024.03.06 06:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Chirag Kinra
State of Haryana
Deepak Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court