Petition seeking relief during a pending criminal trial was withdrawn by counsel after the State reported that all witnesses had been examined and the trial Court had fixed the case for defence evidence and arguments. The High Court permitted withdrawal and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
205
CRM-M-3065-2021 Date of Decision: 06.05.2024
Parveen
.… Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and another
.... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA
Present: - Mr. Aashish Chopra, Senior Advocate with Mr. Gagandeep Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Surinder Kumar Dagar, DAG, Haryana.
NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL)
At the very outset, learned counsel for the State, on instructions from SI Sajjan Kumar, submits that all the witnesses have been examined and today is the date fixed before the learned trial Court for defence evidence and arguments.
Learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that he
may be permitted to withdraw the present petition.
Permitted to do so.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
06.05.2024 (NIDHI GUPTA) Divyanshi JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No ������������������� ��������
DIVYANSHI 2024.05.07 15:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Parveen
State of Haryana
Nidhi Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
