Petitioners sought dismissal of the petition on account of supervening events rendering it infructuous; the High Court dismissed it accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
276 CRM-M-2924-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision : November 11, 2024
ANKUR BABBAR AND ORS
-PETITIONERS
V/S
STATE OF HARYANA -RESPONDENT
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI
Present: Mr. Nikhil Thamman, Advocate Mr. Nikhil Ghai, Advocate Ms. Malini Singh, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Abhinash Jain, D.A.G., Haryana.
KULDEEP TIWARI, J. (ORAL)
of supervening events, the present petition has become infructuous.
| November | 11, 2024 | (KU | LDEEP TIWARI) JUDGE |
|---|---|---|---|
| devinder | |||
| Whether speaking/reasoned | : | Yes/No | |
| Whether Reportable | : | Yes/No |
DEVINDER YADAV 2024.11.13 12:17 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment
Ankur Babbar and Ors
State of Haryana
Kuldeep Tiwari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
