Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the petition, which the High Court allowed, dismissing it as withdrawn. Counsel for the complainant was directed to ensure the complainant and eye-witnesses appear before the trial Court on fixed dates to avoid delay in trial.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-26536-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: 17.09.2024
Prince @ A nda …Petitioner Versus State of H a ryana ...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL
Present: Mr. Namit Khurana, Advocate , for the petitioner. Mr. Munish Sharma, DAG, H a ryana.
Mr. Harsh Mehla, Advocate, f o r the complainant.
GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J. (Oral)
Reply filed on behalf of the re s pondent/State is taken on record. Today, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may b e permitted t o withdraw the instant petition at t his stage.
In view of the aforesaid subm i ssion, the petition is dismissed a s withdraw n at this stage.
Since it has been informed b y learned State counsel that th e matter is now fixed before the trial Court on 14.10.2024 for recording th e statement s of the complainant and two eye-witnesses, learned counse l representi n g the complainant to ensure that t h e complainant as well as the othe r PWs dul y appear before the trial Court o n the dates as may be fixed fo r recording t heir statements so that the compl a inant and the eye-witnesses canno t be attribut e d any delay in conclusion of trial.
17.09.2024 (GURVINDER SINGH GILL) Vimal JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
VIMAL KUMAR 2024.09.17 17:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Prince @ Anda
State of Haryana
Gurvinder Singh Gill
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
