Anticipatory bail petition withdrawn after State counsel stated the petitioner had joined investigation under Section 41-A Cr.P.C., custodial interrogation was not required and no recovery was pending. Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:PHHC:017841
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
215
CRM-M-2401-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: 08.02.2024
ABHISHEK ANAND
....Petitioner
VERSUS
UT OF CHANDIGARH
....Respondent
CORAM : HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA
Present: Mr. Rakesh Nehra, Senior Advocate with
Mr. Ajay Kalra, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Manish Bansal, Addl. P.P. U.T. Chandigarh.
Mr. Manish Kumar Singla, Advocate with Mrs. Shikha Singla, Advocate for respondent No.2.
MANISHA BATRA, J. (Oral)
( MANISHA BATRA )
08.02.2024
JUDGE
Deepak Patwal
NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO
Deepak Patwal 2024.02.08 18:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Abhishek Anand
UT of Chandigarh
Manisha Batra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
