Pawan Alias Pona v. State of Haryana
Case brief
What is this about?
Regular bail petition under Section 439 CrPC in a 2018 FIR involving murder and Arms Act charges; counsel withdrew the petition before any hearing.
Regular bail petition under Section 439 CrPC in a 2018 FIR involving murder and Arms Act charges; counsel withdrew the petition before any hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
210 2024:PHHC:053475
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-2035-2024 Date of Decision: April 22, 2024
PAWAN ALIAS PONA STATE OF HARYANA
Versus
........Petitioner
........Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA
Present: Mr. Rakesh Kumar Lathwal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Rajiv Sidhu, DAG, Haryana.
HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL)
By way of present petition filed under Section 439 CrPC, prayer has been made for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case bearing FIR No.66 dated 22.03.2018 registered under Sections 302, 307 & 34 of IPC and Section 25 of Arms Act (Sections 120-B, 379-B, 216 and 109 of IPC added later on) at P.S. Baroda, District Sonipat.
Learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the
present petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
| 22.04.2024 Tejwinder |
( |
HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE |
|---|---|---|
| Whether speaking/reasoned | Yes/No | |
| Whether Reportable | Yes/No |
TEJWINDER SINGH 2024.04.23 09:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
4 provisions across 3 enactments
Pawan alias Pona
State of Haryana
HARKESH MANUJA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court