Petition under Section 482 CrPC sought quashing of an order in a complaint case, but the complainant/respondent died. The Court disposed of the petition as infructuous, with liberty to file a fresh petition if any adverse order is passed after the complainant's death.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
222
CRM-M-1948-2020
Date of Decision: 06.08.2024
Jaswant Singh
....Petitioner
Versus
Gurbachan Singh ....Respondent
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA
Present: Mr. Sahil Soi, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Nitesh Sharma, DAG, Punjab.
Mr. Varender Pal Singh Mithewal, Advocate for the respondent.
ANOOP CHITKARA, J.
Seeking quashing of order dated 12.07.2019 passed by the PCS, SDJM, Nakodar in complaint case No.COMI-35-2016, petitioner has come up before this Court by filing the present petition under Section 482 CrPC.
(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE
06.08.2024 anju rani Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable? No
ANJU RANI 2024.08.15 10:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court Chandigarh
1 issue framed by the court
Is the Section 482 CrPC petition maintainable after the death of the complainant before charges are framed?
Jaswant Singh
Gurbachan Singh
Anoop Chitkara
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
