Regular bail petition under Section 439 CrPC in a case under Sections 307/148/149/506 IPC and Arms Act. Counsel for the petitioner prayed for withdrawal of the petition after arguing for some time; the High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
226 2024:PHHC:011103 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-1787-2024 Date of Decision: January 29, 2024
BHOLA SUKLA @ BHOLA SHUKLA
........Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB
........Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA
Present: Mr. Amandeep Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Shubham Kaushik, A.A.G., Punjab.
Mr. Nitin Gupta, Advocate for the complainant.
HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL)
By way of present petition filed under Section 439 CrPC, prayer has been made for grant of regular bail in case FIR No.58 dated 21.06.2023 registered under Sections 307, 148, 149 & 506 of IPC (Section 326 of IPC was added later on) and Sections 25, 54 and 59 of Arms Act at P.S. Division No.4, District Ludhiana.
After arguing for some time learned counsel for the
petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
29.01.2024
Tejwinder
(HARKESH MANUJA)
| JUDGE | |
|---|---|
| Whether speaking/reasoned | Yes/No |
| Whether Reportable | Yes/No |
TEJWINDER SINGH 2024.01.29 18:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Bhola Sukla @ Bhola Shukla
State of Punjab
Harkesh Manuja
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
