Petitioner sought withdrawal of the petition after the Court indicated it was not inclined to entertain it. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
109
CRM-M-16611-2024 Date of decision: July 15th , 2024
Aakib Javed @ Akib Javed
.....Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
.....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL
Present: Mr. Saleem Ahmed, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Gagandeep Singh Chhina, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana.
MANJARI NEHRU KAUL, J. (ORAL)
After arguing for some time, when this Court was not inclined, a prayer was made by learned counsel for the petitioner for withdrawal of the instant petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
| July 15th, | 2024 (MA |
NJARI NEHRU KAUL) |
|---|---|---|
| Puneet | JUDGE | |
| Whether speaking/reasoned | : Yes |
|
| Whether reportable | : No |
PUNEET SACHDEVA 2024.07.15 12:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Aakib Javed @ Akib Javed
State of Haryana
Manjari Nehru Kaul
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
