Anticipatory bail petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in an FIR alleging cheating, forgery and criminal conspiracy. The State informed the court that the petitioner had already been arrested before hearing, rendering the petition infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
103
CRM-M-16195-2024 Date of Decision:09.07.2024
PREET SURINDER SINGH
… Petitioner
vs
STATE OF PUNJAB
… Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL
Present: None for the petitioner.
Mr. Rajiv Verma, DAG, Punjab
SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J.(ORAL)
DINESH KUMAR 2024.07.10 10:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document at the bottom of left side
DINESH KUMAR 2024.07.10 10:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document at the bottom of left side
9 provisions across 2 enactments
Preet Surinder Singh
State of Punjab
Sandeep Moudgil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
