The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed an un-pressed criminal appeal where the appellant requested independent judgment on pending proceedings from a supplementary charge-sheet.
Direction to trial court to act independently on supplementary charge-sheet.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRM-A-1526-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
202
CRM-A-1526-2019 Decided on : 29.10.2024
Hassan Khan
. . . Appellant(s)
Versus
State of Haryana and others
. . . Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH
PRESENT: Mr. R.S. Cheema, Sr. Advocate with Mr. A.S. Cheema, Advoate for the appellant(s).
Mr. Abhinash Sain, DAG-cum-Public Prosecutor, Haryana. ****
SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J. (Oral)
Needless to say that the learned Judge, who would conduct the
JAWALA RAM 2024.11.04 16:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
CRM-A-1526-2019 - 2 -
trial on the basis of supplementary charge-sheet would act in accordance with law independently and reach to the independent conclusion.
Misc. application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA) JUDGE
(SANJAY VASHISTH) JUDGE
October 29, 2024 J.Ram Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No
JAWALA RAM 2024.11.04 16:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Hassan Khan
State of Haryana
Sanjeev Prakash Sharma
Sanjay Vashisth
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
