Petition to quash FIR No.72 dated 15.12.2023, Police Station Dorangla, District Gurdaspur, under Section 420 IPC based on a compromise. The Magistrate confirmed the compromise was voluntary; the High Court quashed the FIR and all subsequent proceedings qua the petitioner following the Full Bench ruling in Kulwinder Singh.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana At Chandigarh
CRM-M-14780-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision:-4.11.2024
Baljinder Singh … Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and another ... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL
Present:Mr. Vinod Kumar, Advocate for Mr. Munish Puri, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Japjot Singh, AAG, Punjab.
Ms. Deepti Rampal, Advocate for respondent No.2.
GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J . (Oral)
Pankaj Kakkar 2024.11.05 11:57 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
CRM-M-14780-2024 (O&M) ( 2 )
been recorded to the effect that they have compromised the matter amongst themselves.
4.11.2024 ( Gurvinder Singh Gill ) Pankaj Judge Whether reasoned/speaking Yes / No Whether reportable Yes / No
Pankaj Kakkar 2024.11.05 11:57 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the FIR under Section 420 IPC and subsequent proceedings could be quashed on the basis of a compromise between the parties.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of PunjabRelied on¶6
2007(3) RCR (Crl.) 1052 Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Baljinder Singh
State of Punjab
Harpreet Singh
Gurvinder Singh Gill
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
