Petition for regular bail in an NDPS case registered at Police Station Samana, District Patiala. Counsel sought withdrawal after the court indicated it was not inclined to grant bail. Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
106
CRM-M No.14636 of 2024 Date of decision : 19.7.2024
Soni Singh
………….Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab …….Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL
Present: Mr. Vineet Kumar Jakhar, Advocate, for the petitioner
Mr. Rajiv Verma, DAG, Punjab
SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL)
This petition under section 439 Cr.P.C. has been filed for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.143 dated 13.8.2019, under Sections 22, 25 and 29 of the NDPS Act, 1985, registered at Police Station Samana, District Patiala.
(SANDEEP MOUDGIL)
JUDGE
19.7.2024
Ashwani
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
Yes/No
Ashwani Kumar 2024.07.20 11:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner was entitled to regular bail under Sections 22, 25 and 29 of the NDPS Act in FIR No.143 dated 13.8.2019.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Soni Singh
State of Punjab
Sandeep Moudgil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
