Dismissed
Lovepreet Singh v. State of Punjab
Punjab & Haryana HCCRM-M/12784/2023
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Petitioner absent despite notice; petition dismissed for want of prosecution.
What the court decided
AI extract
Petitioner absent despite notice; petition dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
N.C. No.2024:PHHC:022414
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
216
CRM-M-12784-2023 (O&M) Date of decision: 16.02.2024
LOVEPREET SINGH
....Petitioner(s)
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB
...Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY
Present : None for the petitioner.
Mr. Ankit Grewal, DAG Punjab.
SANJIV BERRY. J. (Oral)
There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, despite specific notice being sent by the Registry. It is presumed that the petitioner does not want to proceed with the petition. As such, the present petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
Pending applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of.
(SANJIV BERRY) JUDGE 16.02.2024 S.Sharma(syr) Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/ No
SANDAL SHARMA 2024.02.16 17:28 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment
Lovepreet Singh
State of Punjab
Sanjiv Berry
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court