Second regular bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in an NDPS Act FIR pending trial. Counsel sought withdrawal of the petition, and the court dismissed it as withdrawn without any substantive adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:PHHC:050742
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Sr. No. 220 CRM-M-12199-2023(O&M) Date of Decision:16.04.2024
IMTIAZ AHMED
... PETITIONER
VERSUS
STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER
... RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON'BL E MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL
Present: Mr. Tanvir Singh Attariwala, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. T.P.S. Chawla, Sr. DAG, Punjab
Mr. Gagandeep Singh Wasu, Advocate for respondent No.2.
VIKAS BAHL , J.(ORAL )
1. The second bail petition has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail to the petitioner, pending trial in case FIR No. 90 dated 01.07.2021 (Annexure P-1), registered under Sections 21(c), and 21, 27-A and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotrophic Substances Act, 1985, added later on, at Police Station Garhshankar, District Hoshiarpur, Punjab.
withdrawn.
( VIKAS BAHL ) JUDGE
16.04.2024 dinesh
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No
DINESH KUMAR 2024.04.20 10:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document at the bottom of left side
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Imtiaz Ahmed
State of Punjab
Vikas Bahl
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
