The High Court allowed the withdrawal of the main prosecution under Section 482 Cr.P.C. upon the statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
The main prosecution petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
********
103 CRM-30774-2024 in/and CRM-M-11386-2024 Date of Decision.:06.08.2024
Vikash Singh @ Vikas Pe22oner Vs.
State of Haryana Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA
Present: Mr. Arun Sharma, Advocate for the pe��oner.
DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL)
CRM-30774-2024:
This is an applica�on under Sec�on 482 Cr.P.C. seeking withdrawal of the main pe��on i.e. CRM-M-11386-2024, which is fixed for 24.09.2024.
CRM-M-11386-2024:
Learned counsel for the pe��oner has made a statement, so as to withdraw the pe��on.
In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the pe��oner and in view of request made in the aforesaid applica�on, present pe��on is hereby dismissed as withdrawn, as prayed for.
( DEEPAK GUPTA )
JUDGE
August 06, 2024
Nee�ka Tuteja
Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
NEETIKA TUTEJA 2024.08.06 14:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the main prosecution can be withdrawn at this stage.
Whether Section 482 Cr.P.C. enables withdrawal of the proceedings.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vikash Singh
State of Haryana
Deepak Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
