The petition was withdrawn by the petitioner with leave of the court and dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[370] IN THE HIGH COURT OF P UNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIG A RH
CRM-M - 10832-2024 Date of D ecision : 07.11.2024
Prem Sin g h …Petitioner
versus
State of H aryana ….Respondent
Coram : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN
Present: Mr. Harvinder Singh Mann, A dvocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Sandeep Singh Mann, A d dl. AG, Haryana.
PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL)
[1] After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petiti o ner states th a t he does not wish to press the present petition and may be
permitte d to withdraw the same at this st a ge.
[2] In view of the statement of learned counsel for the petitio n er,
the prese n t petition is dismissed as not pr e ssed, at this stage.
(PANKAJ JAIN) JUDGE
07.11.20 2 4 ‘R. Sharma'
Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
RAJNEESH SHARMA 2024.11.08 06:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Prem Singh
State of Haryana
Pankaj Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
